Key Dates
Mark your calendar with these important milestones for the 2026 abstract submission cycle.
Nov 1, 2025
Submissions Open
Jan 9, 2025
Submissions Close
Jan 26, 2026
Acceptance
Notifications
Apr 17, 2026
Presenter Materials
Due
Powered by Ex Ordo
A trusted academic submission and review platform ensuring fairness and transparency throughout the peer review process.
Open to clinicians, trainees, researchers, and community partners of all backgrounds.
Submission Categories
Choose the category that best fits your research and clinical work. All categories undergo rigorous double-blind peer review.
Clinical Research
Original clinical studies, trials, and patient outcome research advancing surgical practice.
Basic & Translational Science
Laboratory research, molecular studies, and bench-to-bedside innovations.
Community & Global Surgery
Community-based interventions, global health initiatives, and surgical access programs.
Medical Student / Resident Education
Educational innovations, curriculum development, and training program outcomes.
Health Equity & Outcomes
Research addressing disparities, access, and outcomes across diverse populations.
Technical Innovation
Submissions showcasing new or improved surgical techniques, technologies, or solutions.
Quality Improvement & Safety
QI projects, patient safety initiatives, and systems-based practice improvements.
Formatting & Requirements
Please ensure your submission meets all of the following criteria before final submission.
Word Limit
Maximum 250 words for abstract body. Title and author information not included in count.
Authors
List all contributing authors with full names, credentials, and institutional affiliations.
Double-Blind Review
Remove all identifying information from the abstract body. Author details submitted separately.
File Format
Submit as .doc, .docx, or PDF. Figures and tables may be included as supplementary files.
Biographical Statement (Optional)
Up to 100 words describing the presenting author's background and research interests.
Review Stages
All submissions undergo initial screening followed by double-blind peer review by experts.
Review Criteria
All abstracts are evaluated by expert reviewers using the following criteria.
Technical Merit
Scientific rigor, methodology, and validity of conclusions
Originality
Novel contributions and innovative approaches to surgical challenges
Readability
Clear writing, logical organization, and effective communication
Relevance
Importance to surgical practice and alignment with LSS mission
All reviews are conducted using a double-blind process to ensure fairness and objectivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
Find answers to common questions about the abstract submission process.